Cross Cultural Management Obtaining Business Creativity

Question: Describe about the Cross Cultural Management for Obtaining Business Creativity. Answer: Introduction Managers both in the international and domestic arenas should master on how to use different cultural teams effectively as they way of obtaining creativity, innovation and experience from them. Studies have shown that cultural differences can hamper the success in the completion of the company projects(Block, 2003, p. 83). In todays international business, managers have put a lot emphasis in managing the multicultural differences among the company employees. This is because aspects such as motivation, employee attitudes and relations at the workplace have proved to be very impactful in the performance of the people(Kawar, 2012, p. 106). This paper seeks to discuss the aspect of multicultural differences management about Vietnam and Turkey. The paper explores the key cultural management aspects such as Hofstede negotiation, globe leadership, trading systems and value systems. The paper investigates which country is high among the mentioned multicultural management aspects. Hofstede Negotiations The findings indicate that several cultural differences affect how people interact and negotiate in the different regions of the world. For the managers to make it in the global business environment they should be fully aware that there is not a single approach of dealing with negotiations. Managers should carry out negotiations by putting into considerations the aspects that can affect the whole process of negotiation(Hofstede, 2000, p. 29). To improve these they should study and understand the cultural diversity among the company employees. For example, in Turkey, English is the most common language used by business people. Turkish people value shaking hands firmly during introduction and business meetings. The Turkish people value relationships more than work. Therefore, it is upon the negotiators to create healthy relationship with the Turkish business people for the success of the negotiations. On the other side, in Vietnam negotiation, negotiators insist on the development of n oble working relations with the negotiating counterparts. Vietnamese put a lot of emphasis on the significance of maintaining trustworthy relations their associates, than economic relations. The findings indicate that negotiations and relationships in Vietnam are based on mutual trust. From the analysis of the two countries, Vietnam seems to have a favorable culture of negotiation that can provide conducive environment for the investors. Globe Leadership Global leadership is one of the major issue facing the global managers today. The findings have shown that the leadership styles of adopted by the managers greatly affect the global leadership(Bersin, 2012). Establishing a global leadership is a challenging task that requires the managers to assess the current environment by learning from the current managers in the global business. In the aspect of global leadership, Vietnam seems to score higher than Turkey. For example, the distance power concept of culture holds that the people of Vietnam conform to hierarchical order portrayed by the organizational leadership. This means that the employees expect to receive the order from the management and execute them as instructed. The hierarchy in Vietnam organizations is centralized, and thus employees seem to accept this type of leadership to the level of seventy percent(Itim International, 2007). On the other side, Turkey scores sixty-six percent. Therefore, globe leadership seems to be e asy for any company anticipating to invest or penetrate the market of Vietnam. Trading Relationship Global trade entails various transactions between the sellers and the buyers. For effective penetration in the global industries, managers have to carry out the analysis of the targeted investment region(Baldwin Kay, 2005, p. 122). This helps in determining the success of the company in the new environment. The diverse cultures are one of the aspects that the leaders should consider when evaluating the trading relationship portrayed by the buyers and the sellers in the difference countries. In a comparison of Turkey and Vietnam, Turkey seems to have an upper hand regarding trading relationship with other countries. Turkey has solid trading solid trading relations with the European Union. This means that the country gets to enjoy trading with all the partners in the European Union. Since 1995 when the custom was established Turkey has been experiencing successful trading relations with the European Union members(European Commission, 2016). The statistics show that Turkey has had effi cient trading with its partners. Besides, European Union Turkey is trading with other nations in the Middle East as well with countries such as Syria and Russia. On the other side, Vietnam is trying to boost its trading relation with the key partners in the globe. The consequences of Vietnam War seemed to have greatly affected the trading relations of Vietnam. For example, Vietnam experienced weak relations with the United States until twenty years back when the two countries went into trade agreement. However, despite Vietnam establishing trading agreements with the United States, its trading relationship is shaky and not well established with other trading partners. Therefore, this paper recommends that Turkey has got a higher hand in the trading relationships compared to Vietnam. Value system The most successful companies both in the domestic and international environments have their processes characterized by the aspects of value system. The value system is very crucial in determining the success of the businesses in the given industry(Paarlberg, 2007, p. 393). The value system holds that company activities should be organized in a linear mode to improve the value of the final product. Businesses operating in the value system environment enjoy a higher competitive advantage(Liedtka, 2001, p. 549). To make it effective, the organizations build up the value chain systems against that of their competitors. This ensures that the company will penetrate the market using a different strategy to increase its competitive strategy. The Turkey value system is founded in the feminine. The dominant country values are based on appreciating the quality of life and showing care for the others. This aspect starts in school and is incorporated in the society throughout once live. Under the feminine value system, Turkey scores forty-five percent. The elements of culture that dominate Turkey value system are sympathy for the weak, consensus and equating oneself with others. The conflicts both in the workplace setting and private are solved through consensus. Additionally, leisure is crucial among the turkey citizens as it provides an opportunity to bring family members and friends together. Therefore, managers operating in the Turkish environment should put these aspects into consideration. On the other side, Vietnam scores forty percent on the aspect of the feminine. Therefore, it is evident that Turkey scores higher than Vietnam in the aspect of value system. Conclusions Cross-cultural management is very crucial for the competitive advantage of the companies. Different cultures portrayed by the employees may have negative impacts on the performance of the organization. To obtain the efforts and creativity of all the company employees, the manager should understand all the cultures in his or her organization. This will ease on how the management will relate with the employees. Therefore, management of the cultural diversity should be given a higher priority in the running of the organizations. References Aycan, . Z. Kanungo, R. N., 2000. The impact of culture on human resource management practices: a ten-country comparison, Applied Psychology. An International review, 49(1), pp. 192-221. Baldwin, R. E. Kay, D. A., 2005. International Trade and International Relations. International Organizational, 29(1), pp. 99-131. Bersin, J., 2012. How Does Leadership Vary Across the Globe?. [Online] Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbersin/2012/10/31/are-expat-programs-dead/#1db8b8da1e07 [Accessed 19 September 2016]. Block, W., 2003. Cross Cultural Management. An International Journal, 10(1), pp. 80-86. European Commission, 2016. Enhancement of EU-Turkey bilateral trade relations and modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union. [Online] Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/turkey/ [Accessed 19 September 2016]. Hofstede, G., 2000. Cultures consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Itim International, 2007. Geert Hofstede: What about Vietnam?. [Online] Available at: https://geert-hofstede.com/vietnam.html [Accessed 20 September 2016]. Kawar, T. I., 2012. Cross-cultural Differences in Management. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(6), pp. 105-111. Liedtka, J., 2001. Value contention: Organizational value contentions and managerial mindsets. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), pp. 543-557. Paarlberg, L. E., 2007. Values Management Aligning Employee Values and Organization Goals. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), pp. 387-408.